<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Zero to One-Eighty &#187; fuel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ztoe.net/tag/fuel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ztoe.net</link>
	<description>by Adrian Cooke</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 11:52:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Honda announces hybrid Fit</title>
		<link>http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2008%2F05%2Fhonda-announces-hybrid-fit%2F&#038;seed_title=Honda+announces+hybrid+Fit</link>
		<comments>http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2008%2F05%2Fhonda-announces-hybrid-fit%2F&#038;seed_title=Honda+announces+hybrid+Fit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 23:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Cooke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favourites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hatchback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ztoe.net/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expected to go on sale in “in the early 2010s.”
Related posts:<ul>
<li><a href='http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2008%2F01%2Fhow-fuel-efficient-is-the-honda-fit%2F&amp;seed_title=How+fuel+efficient+is+the+Honda+Fit%3F' rel='bookmark' title='How fuel efficient is the Honda Fit?'>How fuel efficient is the Honda Fit?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2009%2F10%2Fhonda-cr-z%2F&amp;seed_title=Honda+CR-Z' rel='bookmark' title='Honda CR-Z'>Honda CR-Z</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a Tokyo press conference last week Honda <a href="http://www.hondanews.com/categories/872/releases/4510">announced plans</a> to renew its hybrid lineup, part of which includes a gas-electric Fit. The hybrid option is expected within around <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/may2008/gb20080521_332674.htm">five years</a>, and will cost about <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/21/honda-announces-new-only_n_102809.html">$2,000 more</a> than the petrol-only model. Awesome. For an extra $2k we would have stretched to get a hybrid model a year ago—the Prius was then about $10k more; pretty serious difference. And of course the Fit is way cooler. (Sorry Lyds.)</p>
<p>Related posts:<ul>
<li><a href='http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2008%2F01%2Fhow-fuel-efficient-is-the-honda-fit%2F&amp;seed_title=How+fuel+efficient+is+the+Honda+Fit%3F' rel='bookmark' title='How fuel efficient is the Honda Fit?'>How fuel efficient is the Honda Fit?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2009%2F10%2Fhonda-cr-z%2F&amp;seed_title=Honda+CR-Z' rel='bookmark' title='Honda CR-Z'>Honda CR-Z</a></li>
</ul></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2008%2F05%2Fhonda-announces-hybrid-fit%2F&#038;seed_title=Honda+announces+hybrid+Fit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How fuel efficient is the Honda Fit?</title>
		<link>http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2008%2F01%2Fhow-fuel-efficient-is-the-honda-fit%2F&#038;seed_title=How+fuel+efficient+is+the+Honda+Fit%3F</link>
		<comments>http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2008%2F01%2Fhow-fuel-efficient-is-the-honda-fit%2F&#038;seed_title=How+fuel+efficient+is+the+Honda+Fit%3F#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Cooke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favourites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hatchback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ztoe.net/2008/01/04/how-fuel-efficient-is-the-honda-fit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Verdict: pretty good.
Related posts:<ul>
<li><a href='http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2008%2F05%2Fhonda-announces-hybrid-fit%2F&amp;seed_title=Honda+announces+hybrid+Fit' rel='bookmark' title='Honda announces hybrid Fit'>Honda announces hybrid Fit</a></li>
<li><a href='http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2009%2F10%2Fhonda-cr-z%2F&amp;seed_title=Honda+CR-Z' rel='bookmark' title='Honda CR-Z'>Honda CR-Z</a></li>
<li><a href='http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2009%2F02%2Ffever-ray%2F&amp;seed_title=Fever+Ray' rel='bookmark' title='Fever Ray'>Fever Ray</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image"><img src="http://ztoe.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/honda_fit.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="315" /><br /> <small>2007 Honda Fit Sport</small></div>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Honda <a href="/2008/05/honda-announces-hybrid-fit/">announced a hybrid Fit</a> on May 21, 2008.</p>
<p>The <abbr title="U.S. Environmental Protection Agency">EPA</abbr> recently revised it&#8217;s method of calculating fuel efficiency, expressed as MPG (Miles Per Gallon). According to the agency&#8217;s report, <a href="http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2006/December/Day-27/a9749.htm">Fuel Economy Labeling of Motor Vehicles</a>: Revisions To Improve Calculation of Fuel Economy Estimates:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>New test methods take into account several important factors that affect fuel economy in the real world, but are missing from the existing fuel economy tests. Key among these factors are high speeds, aggressive accelerations and decelerations, the use of air conditioning, and operation in cold temperatures.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A lot of this has come about because independent reports have criticised the EPA&#8217;s methods for failing to approximate real world driving conditions. Pre-2008 city and highway estimation methods, according to the EPA, were first created about 40 years ago and have been revised only once, in the 1980s. These methods assume a conservative &#8220;driving style&#8221; (at least by north-eastern standards) and temperate environmental driving conditions modelled on the climate of southern California. (Which is to say, the EPA&#8217;s window stickers on cars in dealer lots fell a long way short of &#8220;real world driving conditions&#8221; in 2007. There are city and highway figures, then there&#8217;s &#8220;You&#8217;re a New Englander, and assuming you drive like an asshole…&#8221; figures).</p>
<p>Interestingly, with the new revisions the most fuel efficient vehicles (gas-electric hybrids) have the most sharply (i.e. downwardly) revised mileage estimates:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>City estimates for some of the most fuel-efficient vehicles, including gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles, will decrease by 20 to 30 percent. The highway mpg estimates for most vehicles will drop on average by about 8 percent, with some estimates dropping by as much as 25 percent.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Which explains the confusion when I read on the federal government&#8217;s <a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/">fuel economy site</a> that the 2008 Honda Fit was dramatically less efficient than the one we own. (Although it might seem like a hybrid—&#8221;one of those &#8216;double cars&#8217;&#8221; as a friend of ours calls it—it&#8217;s not. Nevertheless, the Fit is an economical car by U.S. standards, and it&#8217;s certified as a &#8220;low emissions vehicle,&#8221; meaning that it produces relatively low pollutant emissions aside from the absolute amount of gasoline that it consumes.)</p>
<p>Whereas the EPA&#8217;s MPG window sticker on our model, a 2007 Fit Sport manual, read &#8220;City: 33, Highway: 38&#8243; when we bought it in March, the same model in 2008 reads &#8220;City: 28, Highway: 34.&#8221; It turns out that the 2008 model is rated with the same figures, adjusted for the new estimation methods, as the 2007 Fit. Both models get a 6 out of 10 air pollution score. (For an opposite-end-of-the-spectrum comparison, the Ford F150 pickup, 2WD 6 cylinder automatic gets 14/19 respectively under the new rules, and 3 out of 10 for pollutants.)</p>
<p>Also interesting is that the 2007 Honda Civic Hybrid, which trailed the 2007 Toyota Prius on highway mileage 45 to 60 under the old system, is now the Prius&#8217;s equal at 45 apiece under the new. To my knowledge the Civic and the Prius are the only models that have ever <a href="http://www.epa.gov/fueleconomy/overall-high.htm">broken the 40 MPG barrier</a> on both city and highway tests (currently measured at 40/45 and 48/45 respectively).</p>
<p>Overall, the EPA&#8217;s new tests have shortened the total range of MPG estimates for passenger vehicles, which I take as a sign that the estimates are now more valid. I haven&#8217;t looked at the methodology but the new figures for the Fit accord with my own observations: we don&#8217;t get 38 miles per gallon on the highway in winter, although we may get close to it on long trips in the summertime, and low-30s is probably a more accurate annual average than mid-30s.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m clearly biased, but to those interested in the Fit, and in the market for a fuel efficient car, you can do better, but not for the price. At $15k the Fit is just about the best value/design/efficiency bundle you can find. (The Toyota Corolla gets better highway mileage, but the Fit is empirically way cooler. And I don&#8217;t think that the Yaris is actually a car.) I hope that our next set of wheels is a hybrid, but at today&#8217;s prices that privilege will set the buyer back an additional $10k.</p>
<p>QED. The Fit is (ahem)… Go.</p>
<p>Related posts:<ul>
<li><a href='http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2008%2F05%2Fhonda-announces-hybrid-fit%2F&amp;seed_title=Honda+announces+hybrid+Fit' rel='bookmark' title='Honda announces hybrid Fit'>Honda announces hybrid Fit</a></li>
<li><a href='http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2009%2F10%2Fhonda-cr-z%2F&amp;seed_title=Honda+CR-Z' rel='bookmark' title='Honda CR-Z'>Honda CR-Z</a></li>
<li><a href='http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2009%2F02%2Ffever-ray%2F&amp;seed_title=Fever+Ray' rel='bookmark' title='Fever Ray'>Fever Ray</a></li>
</ul></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ztoe.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fztoe.net%2F2008%2F01%2Fhow-fuel-efficient-is-the-honda-fit%2F&#038;seed_title=How+fuel+efficient+is+the+Honda+Fit%3F/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.272 seconds -->

